Dr Tenpenny on Flu vaccines

 

Alex talks with Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, one of the country's most knowledgeable and outspoken physicians regarding the impact of vaccines on health, about a mysterious illness in Texas and its possible link to vaccines.

http://drtenpenny.com/

These Doctors and scientists should go back to school and take science 101

 

 

The Pharmaceutical industry and some doctors are trying to make you believe that Vitamins and Minerals are worthless and possibly harmful. They are using the Main stream media to push this message to brainwash the masses.

These scientists and doctors should lose their license for not being able to read and interpret scientific studies and sort out good quality science from flawed science.

Before I get into exposing and pointing out the many flaws in these studies, I like to begin by saying that Vitamins and minerals are ESSENTIAL to life. They are not optional. In order for the body to work properly you need 90 essential nutrients. If you don't have these in your diet your body will degenerate and you will end up with deficiencies and health problems.

I Believe that it is so important to supplement with these essential nutrients because our soils are depleted in them.

Because I know that most people don't have the time to sit here and read through all the details, I will make quick bullet points as to the flaws.

In the first study:

*Low quality, low levels of vitamins were used.
*participants were allowed to be in this study even if they took the multivitamin just 2/3rd of the time.
* The adherence rate was based on the participants' memory and not scientifically documented.
    (every scientist knows that this is the worst way to track something)
* Even participant drop outs were included in the study !!!
* Low doses of vitamins and minerals were used. 60mg of vitmain C, 25mcg of Vitamin B12, and 20mcg of selenium. Any expert on nutrition research knows that these low doses of nutrients will most likely show no health benefit besides possibly preventing scurvy.
The researches even said that the Vitamins used may be too low !!!

The ultimate scientific quackery is the fact that they compared a higher rate of diabetic who took the multivitamin and put them up against a placebo with a lower rate of diabetics !!!

Read an excellent breakdown here:
http://www.lef.org/featured-articles/Flawed-Research-Used-to-Attack-Multivitamin-Supplements.htm

Study : Flu shots greatly increases the risk of contracting one or more respiratory viruses !!

"Based on apparently the only double-blind placebo-controlled influenza vaccination and outcomes study conducted  (in healthy children 6 to 15 years of age), which has been published in a peer-reviewed journal, it is clear that getting a flu shot greatly increases the risk (by 4-plus-fold) that a person who receives it will contract and potentially spread one or more non-influenza respiratory viruses, some of which are not serious and morbid infections in humans."

Dr. Paul King

http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2012/03/13/cid.cis307

Gluten: What You Dont Know Might Kill You

Could a slice of bread be the source of your health problems? Dr. Mark Hyman says yes! In this weeks UltraWellness blog, he explains how a common compound in many foods can trigger chronic disease and even raise your risk of dying—and he tells you how to eliminate it from your diet, safely and easily

Guess what researchers found was linked to Autism?

"Researchers from Harvard University’s School of Public Health found that pregnant women exposed to high levels of diesel particulates or mercury were twice as likely to have an autistic child compared with peers in low-pollution areas. The findings, published today in Environmental Health Perspectives, are from the largest U.S. study to examine the ties between air pollution and autism"

Researchers said that it is most likely due to chemicals in air pollution particularly diesel particulates or mercury.

Gee Let me guess...where are children repeatedly exposed to high concentration of mercury?
Um it couldn't be those vaccines they are constantly receiving huh ?????

What researchers and the establishment/corporate controlled media will never admit or even hypothesize is that mercury containing vaccines are what is probably causing autism...which is one of the most concentrated ways people contaminate their bodies with mercury. Mercury and other biohazard toxins are injected directly into children's blood. Some vaccines still contain 25 mcg of mercury which is 250 times the EPA's safety limit !!!

 I love Corn Free Vitamin C :)

http://www.wellnessresources.com/products/vitamin_c.php/#a_aid=wellnessid

Busting The GMO Myths

Myth 1

"The American farmer today can feed the world because we have experimented. We have done research, and hybrid,” Republican Rep. Bernard Ayotte said during Tuesday’s debate on the House version of the bill. “I’m not against GMO labeling. What I fear is that this bill may lead to the curtailment or stopping of GMO experiments.”
Gmo's yield less crops globally than conventional and organic crops.


Myth 2

“We oppose current initiatives to mandate labeling of ingredients developed from GM seeds in the absence of any demonstrated risks,” the company says on its website. “Such mandatory labeling could imply that food products containing these ingredients are somehow inferior to their conventional or organic counterparts.” Monsanto

Really? absence of risk?
How about this study and this study which produced tumors and leukemia in lab animals.




                                                     Sources:
US Farmers May Stop Planting GM's After Poor Global Yields
http://www.fwi.co.uk/articles/06/02/2013/137518/us-farmers-may-stop-planting-gms-after-poor-global-yields.htm#.UboeVM_D_IU

Maine Passes GMO Bill
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/maine-legislature-easily-passes-gmo-labeling-bill-article-1.1370871

Aspirin linked to Eye disease

If you listen to your stupid doctor's advise you might end up blind. A new study conducted by the University of Sydney  found an association between regular aspirin usage and Macular Degeneration.

While there is no doubt that aspirin has the ability to prevent you from getting a heart attack, is that really the wisest way to do it? I think that there is something wrong with the idea of using a drug to maintain your health. All pharmaceutical Drugs are toxic and need to be processed by the bodies poison control center...The liver. You are putting a heavy burden on your liver everytime you take a pharmaceutical drug whether its prescription or over the counter.

There are smarter stratgegies out there that I would use if I was worried about my cardiovascular health.

The first thing is obviously to eat a better diet & exercise

I would take a multivitamin and add additional  Vitamin C, Magnesium , Selenium, Vitamin K, Omega 3 fatty acids, CoQ10, Vitamin E, and chromium.

I would use these at their theurapeutic dosages which are well above the RDA's.

* This is my opinion and what I would do for myself based on the research I have done, I am not a medical doctor (thank god) nor are these statements approved by the FDA.

http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1558450#METHODS
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/22/aspirin-macular-degeneration-age-related_n_2527221.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/20/aspirin-macular-degeneration-vision_n_2338493.html?1358876037

I Recommend and buy most of my vitamins from Wellness Resources.

They are an excellent company with High Quality products.

Click on the Banner below to get transported to their Site

GMO A GO GO Animation

Natural News created a funny & informative animation about GMO'S

Pass it along to your friends !!!

New study: Infants receiving the most vaccines are the most likely to be hospitalized and die

(NaturalNews)
Neil Z. Miller

A new study, published in Human and Experimental Toxicology, a peer-reviewed journal indexed by the National Library of Medicine, analyzed more than 38,000 reports of infant hospitalizations and deaths following vaccinations. [1] Researchers found statistically significant correlations between the number of vaccine doses administered to infants and infant hospitalization and mortality rates: babies who receive the most vaccines tend to have higher (worse) hospitalization and death rates.

Infants who received 2 vaccines simultaneously were significantly less likely to be hospitalized than infants who received 3 or more vaccines at the same time. Infants who received 3 vaccines simultaneously were significantly less likely to be hospitalized than infants who received 4 or more vaccines at the same time. Babies who received 6, 7, or 8 vaccines during a single pediatric well-baby visit were the most likely to be hospitalized following their injections. In fact, the hospitalization rate increased linearly from 11.0% for infants receiving 2 vaccine doses to 23.5% for infants receiving 8 vaccine doses.

The authors of the study, Dr. Gary Goldman and Neil Z. Miller, also discovered that younger infants were significantly more likely to be hospitalized after receiving vaccinations than older infants. In addition, infants who received 5-8 vaccines simultaneously were significantly more likely to die following their shots than infants who received 1-4 vaccines simultaneously.

Several factors could contribute to whether an infant will have an adverse reaction to vaccines, including a genetic predisposition, illness (which may be a contraindication to vaccine administration), quality of vaccines (which can vary by manufacturing methods), and sensitivity to one or more vaccine components. Some infants might be more likely to experience an adverse reaction due to biochemical or synergistic toxicity associated with concurrent administration of multiple vaccines.

In 1990, infants received a total of 15 vaccine doses prior to their first year of life. By 2007, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended 26 vaccine doses for infants: 3 DTaP, 3 polio, 3 Hib, 3 hepatitis B, 3 pneumococcal, 3 rotavirus, and 2 influenza vaccines.

The CDC's Childhood Immunization Schedule Was Not Tested for Safety, Lacks Scientific Veracity:

While each childhood vaccine has individually undergone clinical trials to assess safety, studies have not been conducted to determine the safety (or efficacy) of combining vaccines during a single physician visit as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) guidelines. For example, 2-, 4-, and 6-month-old infants are expected to receive vaccines for polio, hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, rotavirus, Haemophilus influenzae type B, and pneumococcal, all during a single well-baby visit -- even though this combination of 8 vaccines was never tested in clinical trials.

Although the CDC's recommended childhood immunization schedule a) requires infants to receive up to 8 vaccines simultaneously, b) affects millions of infants annually, and c) was never scientifically tested for safety, the CDC had prior knowledge that combining chemical substances, including prescribed pharmaceuticals, "can produce health consequences that are additive, synergistic, antagonistic, or can potentiate the response expected from individual component exposures."[2]

Administering 6, 7, or 8 vaccine doses to an infant during a single physician visit may certainly be more convenient for parents -- rather than making additional trips to the doctor's office -- but evidence of a positive association between infant adverse reactions and the number of vaccine doses administered confirms that vaccine safety must remain the highest priority.

The findings in this study show a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses administered and the percentage of hospitalizations and deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). (The VAERS database is an important postmarketing safety surveillance tool that is periodically analyzed by the CDC, FDA, and other vaccine researchers to discover potentially adverse vaccination trends.) In addition, younger infants were significantly more likely than older infants to be hospitalized or die after receiving vaccines. These trends not only have a biological plausibility but are supported by evidence from case reports, case series, and other studies using entirely different methodologies and unique population cohorts. For example, in 2011, Miller and Goldman collaborated on another study showing that among developed nations infant mortality increased with an increase in the number of vaccine doses.[3]

Since vaccines are given to millions of infants annually, it is imperative that health authorities have scientific data from synergistic toxicity studies on all combinations of vaccines that infants might receive. Finding ways to increase vaccine safety should be the highest priority.

You may download the complete study here: Goldman-Miller Vaccine Study (PDF) or here: Goldman-Miller Vaccine Study

Funding Acknowledgment: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) donated $2500 for open access to the journal article (making it freely available to all researchers). NVIC is dedicated to preventing vaccine injuries and deaths through public education.

References:

1. Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by the number of vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990-2010. Hum Exp Toxicol October 2012; 31(10): 1012-1021.

2. Mixed exposures research agenda: a report by the NORA Mixed Exposures Team. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH); DHHS (NIOSH) 2004. December 2005. p.106: vi.

3. Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity? Hum Exp Toxicol September 2011; 30(9): 1420-1428. [Read this study here: Miller-Goldman Vaccine Study (PubMed)]

Fluoride dangers covered by ABC NEWS

The Main Stream News is Now covering the dangerous health risks of water fluoridation !!!!

http://abclocal.go.com/wtvd/story?section=news/abc11_investigates&id=8887007

Ultrasound Superior To Mammography For Cancer Detection

A Recent Study conducted by the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance found that Ultrasound imaging is a superior screening tool than Mammography.

In fact the sensitivity rate in cancer detection is remarkably higher in Ultrasounds than Mammograms. Ultrasounds sensitivity was 95.7 percent while mammograms were 60.9 percent.

The findings were  published in the Oct. 22 issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology.

This is good news since numerous studies have shown that mammograms pose an increased risk to women in developing breast tumors.

 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15474430
http://www.seattlecca.org/press-release/ultrasound-is-better-detecting-cancer-in-women-under-40.cfm
http://www.naturalnews.com/037134_mammography_breast_cancer_dangers.html

Laugh It's Good For Your Health !!

Laughing is Good For your Health. When you laugh you trigger the release of Endorphins (brain chemicals that make you feel good)

Laughing is good for your heart, boosts your immune system, and relieves pain as well as stress.

Dave Chappelle-Held up on a bus

Pablo Francisco- Immitates Preview Guy

George Carlin

Funny Song

http://www.naturalnews.com/037669_laughter_medicine_blood_sugar.html
http://www.care2.com/greenliving/8-health-benefits-of-laughter.html

University study: Flu vaccine effectiveness claims are wildly exaggerated

(NaturalNews)

It is once again the season of influenza, and the push is on to "get your flu shot." But does this hallmark of Western medicine really provide the protection health experts claim it does? A recent study out of the University of Minnesota (UM) suggests not, having found that the two groups most at risk from developing serious complications from the flu, seniors and children, derive little or no benefit from getting flu shots.

Michael Osterholm from the UM Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy analyzed more than 12,000 peer-reviewed studies, documents, transcripts, and notes dating back to the 1930s, and found that there was very little solid evidence that the flu shot provides any real protection for most people. As it turns out, those at highest risk of suffering from the flu are least likely to derive any benefit from flu shots, especially because flu strains are constantly morphing and becoming more virulent.

"We found that current influenza vaccine protection is substantially lower than for most routine recommended vaccines and is suboptimal," said Osterholm about the findings. "We believe the current influenza vaccine will continue to have a role in reducing influenza morbidity until more effective interventions are available, but we can no longer accept the status quo regarding vaccine research and development."

Research proves that flu shots are medically useless
But what, exactly, is this "role" of which Osterholm speaks? If you consider the findings of a 2011 study published in the journal The Lancet, only 1.5 out of every 100 adults, at best, who get a flu shot will avoid developing influenza. Since only 2.7 out of every 100 adults develops the flu apart from getting a flu shot anyway, the benefits of getting a flu shot are statistically negligible, in other words, according to that particular study.
http://www.naturalnews.com/033998_influenza_vaccines_effectiveness.html

In Osterholm's opinion, a flu shot should ideally be between 85 and 95 percent effective in all age groups before ever being considered effective and useful. This means that the types of flu shots currently administered to hundreds of millions of Americans every single year are complete medical quackery. And yet, even though officials are now admitting this inconvenient truth about flu shots, many are still pushing it as the "best defense available" against the flu, to quote the words of KARE News 11 in Minneapolis, which recently covered Osterholm's study.

If real flu protection is something that matters to you, it may be worth your while to consider supplementing with vitamin D3 during the winter months when natural sunlight exposure is limited. Taking extra B vitamins, eating more organic fruits and vegetables, supplementing with garlic, eating medicinal mushrooms, getting plenty of rest every night, and drinking plenty of purified, mineral-rich water are also highly-effective ways to naturally avoid the flu without risking potentially deadly side effects. (http://www.naturalnews.com/019194_flu_the_health.html)

Also, be sure to check out the special Natural News report The Five Best Anti-Viral Products to Beat Influenza, Swine Flu, Bird Flu, and Sars by the Health Ranger, Mike Adams:
http://www.naturalnews.com/Report_Anti-Viral_Remedies_Influenza_5.html

Sources for this article include:

http://www.kare11.com

http://minnesota.publicradio.org

Learn more:

http://www.naturalnews.com/037620_flu_vaccines_effectiveness_exaggerations.html#ixzz2A4zP8HOn

Study Shows Whey Protein Helps with Weightloss

Researchers at the United States Department of Agriculture published the results of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial showing that whey protein-but not soy protein—is a powerful tool to help weight loss efforts.

The study involved 90 overweight and obese participants who received either 56 grams per day of whey protein, 56 grams per day of soy protein, or 56 grams per day of carbohydrates for 23 weeks. These nutrients were consumed in two smoothie beverages during the day. Other than that, the participants were given no dietary advice and could eat anything else they wanted.

At the end of the study, those who consumed whey protein were 4-5 pounds lighter, their waistlines were smaller, and their hunger was better under control (they had lower ghrelin levels). It is rather amazing that such progress could be made even though there was no effort to actually eat better.

This study is the latest in an impressive body of research in humans on the benefits of whey protein for metabolic fitness, which includes improving insulin resistance and lowering cholesterol, as well as helping weight loss.

Click on Banner Below to Get A High Quality Whey Protein Powder

They Have a 30% Sale going On Thru October 21st !!

 

                                   

Source:

http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publications.htm?seq_no_115=216451

Flu Vaccine INCREASES Risk of Serious Pandemic Flu Illness

By Dr. Mercola

The Canadian press recently broke the story that new research confirms initial findings that the flu vaccine appeared to actually increase people's risk of getting sick with H1N1, and cause more serious bouts of illness to boot.
According to the Vancouver Sun:1
"Researchers, led by Vancouver's Dr. Danuta Skowronski, an influenza expert at the B.C. Centre for Disease Control, noticed in the early weeks of the [2009 H1N1] pandemic that people who got a flu shot for the 2008-09 winter seemed to be more likely to get infected with the pandemic virus than people who hadn't received a flu shot. Five studies done in several provinces showed the same unsettling results."

Read Article Here

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2012/09/18/flu-shot-increases-flu-illness.aspx

6 Studies Last Year Linked Mercury In Flu Shots To Brain Damage, Autism

Researchers from the University of Brazil looked into the effects of low level Thimerosal on neural tissue and behavior.

Their results:

"Mercury causes serious brain damage, and is linked to autism and other developmental diseases in children and Alzheimer's disease in adults"

"Thimerosal accumulates in brain tissue, negatively affects brain development, and harms brain cells"

Does this surprise you? Mercury is one of the most toxic neurotoxins known to man.

Why is it still in Flu vaccines? 

Why is it recommended for pregnant women, children, and the elderly when it contains
250 times the EPA's safety limit for mercury?


Are you still stupid enough to take a flu vaccine?


Read the Full article here:
http://www.naturalnews.com/031870_flu_shots_brain_damage.html#ixzz1HvddTyWl

Chewing Gum Increases Your Mercury Exposure

A study showed that Heavy Gum chewers (5 hours per day) had 2 times the amount of mercury in their blood and three times the amount in their urine and breath than light chewers (30 minutes per day)

The Moral of the story....DONT INSTALL MERCURY FILLINGS INTO YOUR CHILD !!!
LOOK FOR MERCURY FREE FILLINGS !!!

http://www.iol.co.za/scitech/technology/chewing-gum-releases-mercury-in-blood-urine-1.57506
http://rense.com/general6/merc.htm
http://www.mercola.com/article/mercury/no_mercury.htm

HARVARD STUDY FLUORIDE LOWERS IQ

Harvard University published a study on July 20th in the "Environmental Health Perspectives" a US National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences' journal, piling up more evidence that Fluoride is a neurotoxin that lowers IQ's.

The study found that "children in high fluoride areas had significantly lower IQ scores than those who lived in low fluoride areas."

This is not the first time a study has come to this conclusion. 24 previous studies have found that Fluoride Lowers the IQ of children.

The EPA even lists Fluoride as a chemical "with substantial evidence of developmental neurotoxicity."

The question is why is it still in our drinking water, and how long will it take for the federal government to remove it?

Study: Looking at Breasts Increases Heart Health

"A new study says it is actually healthy to stare at a woman's breasts. Five-hundred men participated in the German study. Half were told to refrain from looking at breasts for five years, the other half were told to ogle them daily. The study found the men who stared at breasts more often showed lower rates of heart problems, a lower resting heart rate and lower blood pressure. The authors of the study recommend that men stare at breasts for 10 minutes a day."

Ok so you want me to believe that 250 men were told to not stare at breasts for 5 years? hahaha.

Lose Double The Weight

How?

By logging what you eat in a Food Diary. A Study Conducted by the Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research showed that dieters lose nearly twice as much weight by keeping a Food Diary than those who dont.

Keeping a Food Diary is an effective way to lose weight because it gives you a birds eye view of what you are eating.

At the end of the day you can look back at what you ate, analyze it, and see where you made good food choices and where you need improvement.  Keeping track of what you eat also gives you accountability for your actions. You are more likely to make healthier food choices if you are logging everything you put in your mouth down. Tell at least one other person that you are keeping a food diary and show it to them regularly. This will add more accountability to the picture.

In order to have an effective Food Diary you must be as specific as possible.
Write down the food item, the time you ate it, the portion size (ex. 1 cup, 6 oz,), how the food was prepared (ex. fried, boiled, sauteed, raw)

I like using a memo pad specifically for this purpose.

If you like using Phone Apps this will be helpful to you:
http://www.myfitnesspal.com/


I will be doing a series of blogs on weightloss
Stay tuned for more...