1.3 million wrongly treated after false positives from mammograms

(NaturalNews)

The Susan G. Komen for breast cancer awareness reports on their site that breast cancer will strike more than 1.3 million women annually over the next 20 years. They are proud to report that 70 percent of women 40 and older receive regular mammograms now. What they aren't telling the public is that their pharmaceutical and radiation-funding "awareness" project is giving millions of women false diagnoses by the very mammogram technology they promote. As a matter of fact, the New England Journal of Medicine has identified approximately 1.3 million cases of misdiagnosed breast cancer, concluding that mammograms are leading millions of women astray, making them believe they have cancer when they really don't.

http://www.naturalnews.com/040331_Susan_G_Komen_mammograms_breast_cancer.html
http://www.wellnessresources.com/products/daily_energy.php/#a_aid=wellnessid

Angelina Jolie removes breast tissue based on a doctors Estimate?

Angelina Jolie just had a double mastectomy yet she did not have cancer. She chose to have it for "preventative reasons" because her doctors told her that she had a gene that made her 87% likely to get breast cancer and some point. She also had a family history of it.

"My doctors estimated that I had an 87 percent risk of breast cancer and a 50 percent risk of ovarian cancer, although the risk is different in the case of each woman," Jolie wrote. "Once I knew that this was my reality, I decided to be proactive and to minimize the risk as much I could. I made a decision to have a preventive double mastectomy."

My thoughts on this...

I think that it is a foolish thing to remove any organ or tissue from your body if you don't have cancer. The removal was based on a doctors estimate?  How did he come up with this number?

Fear is the tool of the Main stream medical system/Chemo Mafia

Cancer can show up anywhere in the body even if you remove organ and tissues. I think cleaning up a toxic environment in the body would be a better approach rather than removing body parts or tissues that are not cancerous.

http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/14/showbiz/angelina-jolie-double-mastectomy/index.html


This Blog post is protected by the first amendment. This post or any post on this blog is not meant to be medical advise. Consult your doctor or other healthcare professional for medical advise.

The Best Quality Supplements


 

Ultrasound Superior To Mammography For Cancer Detection

A Recent Study conducted by the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance found that Ultrasound imaging is a superior screening tool than Mammography.

In fact the sensitivity rate in cancer detection is remarkably higher in Ultrasounds than Mammograms. Ultrasounds sensitivity was 95.7 percent while mammograms were 60.9 percent.

The findings were  published in the Oct. 22 issue of the American Journal of Roentgenology.

This is good news since numerous studies have shown that mammograms pose an increased risk to women in developing breast tumors.

 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15474430
http://www.seattlecca.org/press-release/ultrasound-is-better-detecting-cancer-in-women-under-40.cfm
http://www.naturalnews.com/037134_mammography_breast_cancer_dangers.html